English Writing aims to develop learners' skills in the exploration of ideas through writing
Learners investigate texts and create their own, producing a significant body of original work. Emphasis is given to developing skills in crafting writing, both through workshop processes and through investigation of other writers' approaches. As part of their study, learners undertake personal reading and viewing programs designed to support and extend their work, responding personally, creatively and critically.
On successful completion of this course, learners will have developed knowledge and skills that enable them to:
English Foundation provides a pathway to the study of English Writing. Successful completion of English Writing prepares learners for tertiary study in a range of areas, including English.
This course has a complexity level of 3.
At Level 3, the learner is expected to acquire a combination of theoretical and/or technical and factual knowledge and skills and use judgement when varying procedures to deal with unusual or unexpected aspects that may arise. Some skills in organising self and others are expected. Level 3 is a standard suitable to prepare learners for further study at tertiary level. VET competencies at this level are often those characteristic of an AQF Certificate III.
This course has a size value of 15.
In English Writing learners will create texts appropriate to purpose, context and audience in a range of text types. The course has a strong focus on the composition and crafting of imaginative texts, (*)allowing learners to transform their experiences and knowledge into texts as they develop understandings of themselves as creators of texts of publishable quality. Learners will experiment with compositional styles while reflecting on their investigation of how other writers compose, craft and revise their texts. They will engage with personally significant issues, imagine the past, present, future and the fantastic, and devise texts that are shaped by their purpose and the audiences for whom they are intended.
English Writing learners will explore how they and other writers communicate meaning by exploring the effects of and relationships between language, themes, context, text structures and features. By writing about contemporary and historical themes in contemporary styles students will gain increasing awareness of the cultural, social and technical dimensions of texts and their audience. They will have the opportunity to explore the elements of intertextuality in literature that affects the way readers and writers make meaning. They will explore the ways different discourses position audiences and their creators politically, culturally, ethically and with respect to gender and social status. They will be able to reflect on the way their reading influences their responses to texts and enriches their writing as powerful constructors of personal and social identity.
They will read like a writer, reflecting on the contexts in which the texts are created and received. Learners will develop an increasingly complex understanding and discernment of stylistic devices through discussion, reflection and text production. They will engage with significant issues in a rigorous way, shape thoughts on, hypothesise about, analyse, question and create representations of the world and consider valued ways of make ethical decisions about issues, events and actions. They will work as a community of writers, evaluating and responding to others’ texts and reflecting on others’ reading of their texts to enrich their understanding of the capacity of language and language structures to communicate ideas.
Through the study of English Writing learners will develop time management skills and increasing responsibility for their own learning by planning, monitoring and reflecting on their own progress to meet set goals and time frames. They will create sustained texts of varying lengths, in a range of genre, styles and forms, to produce a folio of crafted pieces.
*In general, in Australian Curriculum: English, texts are classified as imaginative, interpretive, analytical or persuasive types of texts although these distinctions are neither static nor discrete and particular texts can belong to more than one category. Imaginative texts are texts whose primary purpose is to entertain or provoke thought through their imaginative use of literary elements. They are recognised for their form, style and artistic or aesthetic value.
There are five modules:
THE CRAFT OF WRITING | approximately 20% of course design-time |
WRITERS AND THEIR WRITING | approximately 15% of course design-time |
IDEAS, ISSUES AND TEXTS | approximately 30% of course design-time |
WRITING AND TECHNOLOGY | approximately 15% of course design-time |
THE WRITING PROJECT | approximately 20% of course design-time |
ALL MODULES ARE COMPULSORY.
Modules do not have to be delivered in the sequence shown above. Providers can design programs of study that combine the modules, so long as all modules are covered.
MODULE A – THE CRAFT OF WRITING
(approximately 20% of course design-time)
Focus: This module explicitly develops the technical skills that underpin the course by focusing on the tools of writing and the process of developing an idea into a crafted piece.
Learners will explore and experiment with voice, tone, point of view, dialogue, sentence structure, syntax, imagery, use of detail, characterisation, opening, closing and the purpose of titles. Examples from modern and traditional texts will be shared to illustrate their use, and encourage trialling of techniques. Revision strategies will also be covered, including workshopping and taking different points of entry.
TECHNIQUES (ALL MUST BE ADDRESSED, THE ORDER IN WHICH THESE TOPICS ARE DELIVERED IS NOT PRESCRIBED):
Descriptive Writing
How writers use language for effect, especially imagery, is researched and explored. Learners will experiment with ‘showing not telling’ while considering examples of different styles of descriptive writing will demonstrate the breadth and effect of description.
Words and Meanings
Words carry the writer’s message. Work will focus on the writer’s meaning, vocabulary, linguistic choices for topic, context and style and the rhythms of language. The effects of characters’ names and of settings and titles on the audience’s understanding of the writer’s intentions are explored.
Creating Character
The focus will be on a close observation of people, at the ways they see the world, and how different people react in different contexts. The ways characters are developed through their actions and perspectives are also examined. Students work on making their writing convincing using a balance of description, dialogue and plot development. The effect of creating characters as reliable or unreliable narrators for their audience is discussed.
Dialogue and Monologue
The development of voice through the writing of interior monologue and dialogue in both prose and script is explored. How voice reflects character is considered. The use of silence and underplay is also explored.
Point of View
Learners look at how point of view is used to guide readers to reflect on ideas and issues and the effect of perspective on writing. Perspectives including third person omniscient or limited perspective will be experimented with and contrasted with the effect of telling from first or second person perspective.
Writing Structures
The range of possibilities for structuring writing is explored in prose, for example, time shifts, multiple narratives, ‘what if?’ stories and combinations of prose forms are explored. Openings, lead sentences, paragraphing, linking are worked on. Plot structures will be considered, including the effects of major and minor climaxes in the story line.
Writers and Research
Research takes many forms for writers. Research might involve focuses on the context, the social, economic and political circumstances of an idea.
The Writing Process
Through close examination of writing samples including their own, learners refine their drafting and editing skills. The process of workshopping writing in a collaborative way is emphasised.
Rules and Conventions of Writing for Publication
Common grammatical and punctuation rules and their purposes are explored. Referencing and publishing conventions will be considered and practised. Through close examination of writing samples including their own and others in their writing community, students will refine their editing skills and gain experience of publication requirements.
MODULE B – WRITERS AND THEIR WRITING
(approximately 15% of course design-time)
Focus: The aim of this module is for learners to become familiar with the ways writers develop their ideas into texts and to practise some of these techniques. They will consider how authors, essayists, poets, playwrights, journalists, social commentators and biographers create work within their social contexts, and use specific structures and techniques to express their ideas.
Learners will choose the most appropriate activities for their Module B studies from the following list:
Learners will share their ideas with their writing community and then emulate some aspects of others’ writing styles.
Examples of ways learners may create texts in this Module include:
In this Module learners will explicitly consider:
MODULE C – IDEAS, ISSUES AND TEXTS
(approximately 30% of the course design-time)
Focus: This module develops learners’ understanding of how ideas are communicated through exploring forms and genres.
There are two parts to this module.
MODULE C, PART 1 – IDEAS AND ISSUES
Learners are introduced to a range of ideas, in many forms. Examples of writing include: exploring the individual within their environment; the outsider; life decisions and consequences; love and death; and fantasy and reality. Students consider the importance of context - from different perspectives - in the creation of texts. They develop their own plans for exploring an idea or issue, then trial particular forms to best develop that idea.
MODULE C, PART 2 – FORM
This part of the module focuses on how writers use major writing forms to explore contemporary ideas and issues. The elements and explicit rules of a specific form are studied, and ways that writers conform to them, or are challenged by them, are explored. The development of an understanding of structures and features of various forms is achieved through wide reading, discussion and experimentation. Four of the following five writing forms are examined closely:
The purpose of this module is to develop learners’ understanding of how ideas are structured to meet the elements of the form. The focus is also on exploring current forms and genres.
MODULE D – WRITING AND TECHNOLOGY
(approximately 15% of course design-time)
The Module has two parts. Both parts are compulsory.
Module Focus: Learners explore the opportunities technology and the internet offer for innovative writing. Technologies and the internet have developed diverse opportunities for writing and sharing texts. In this study learners investigate the impact 21st Century technology is having on reading and writing.
MODULE D, PART 1 – ‘eREADING’ AND ‘eWRITING’
Focus: Learners consider how technology within the internet, on mobile phones and tablets, influence ways text is read (‘eReading’) and written (‘eWriting’). Learners explore the opportunities current technologies offer to writers from both a creative and analytical perspective.
Learners will consider the impact of technology and the internet on:
From their investigations learners create texts: individually or in a small group. While these texts offer opportunities for e-publication the aim is not necessarily to contribute to the live web, but rather to create texts that meet the requirements of specific electronic text-types. Learners reflect on the effects that 21st Century technology is having on writing for the ‘eReading’ audience, and develop their understanding of the purposes new technologies fulfil and the effects they are having on writing styles and audience responses.
Writing opportunities include creating:
MODULE D, PART 2 – CURRENT ISSUES IN WRITING
Focus: Learners consider the impact of technology and the internet on writers, writing and related issues (such as e-publishing, the writing process or social media).
Learners select one topic from those listed below, undertake a short research project on the topic, and create a written analytical report on their findings.
Examine the impact on-screen texts are having on traditional print publications, and their possible future impacts on writers.
(An examination of the impact of technology and the internet on traditional print publications. How has the publication of novels, poems, plays, essays and/or news items changed over the past 10 years? What might the future hold? What are the implications of such changes for the writer?)
An investigation of a range of innovative and experimental writing techniques that push the boundaries of conventions.
Investigate the writing styles, ideas and issues explored in formal on-screen texts (like blogs, social media websites, forums and ‘chats’) and consider their impact.
(What is ‘social media’? What writing conventions are used? What are the ideas and issues people write about using social media? Who reads social media? Why? What is the impact of social media on the writer, and on society?)
Before the advent of personal computers Marshall McLuhan, in his text ‘Understanding Media: the Extensions of Man’ (1964), coined the phrase ‘The medium is the message’. Students investigate the ways in which computer technology has impacted on the process of writing and the impact of specific audiences on the medium.
(The tools/methods used to create written text have changed over time, and these changes have had impact on the writing process itself. In this study students briefly review major historical changes (e.g. papyrus rolls, parchment codex, pen and paper, typewriters) and consider the impact of such methods on the process of writing. Students undertake an in-depth study of the ways in which computer technology has impacted on the process of writing (e.g. ease of deletion/alteration/revision, tools such as auto-corrections, formatting tools, saving and sharing writing, collaborative writing, publishing), and the impact of specific audiences on the medium.)
MODULE E – THE WRITING PROJECT
(approximately 20% of course design-time)
Focus - Learners negotiate, plan and complete a writing project of between 2500 – 4000 words for external assessment.
The Writing Project must be included in the Writing folio. The Module provides learners with the opportunity to create a lengthy single piece or a collection of unified pieces.
Details and work requirements for the external assessment are given in the TASC-published Writing Folio Guidelines for the year in which study is undertaken.
GENERAL WORK REQUIREMENTS
In addition to the Module-specific work requirements given below, students are required to keep a writer’s notebook to record their collection of ideas for writing, as well as to reflect on their own and others’ texts. The notebook will be maintained and assessed throughout the year.
In addition to the Module-specific work requirements given below, students are required to undertake extensive reading, recording their ideas from the perspective of a writer in their writer’s notebook.
Because we are writers ourselves, we pay close attention to the techniques we discover in the writing we read. I call this “reading like a writer.”
Steve Peha What Can You Say About a Book? (Accessed 7 August 2012)
In addition to sharing the reading of short works in class, students will independently read at least three substantial written texts that relate to their work in the modules. These texts must be from two different periods (for example, 19th Century and 21st Century) and be drawn from at least two different genres.
The list given in the Appendix to this course document contains illustrative examples of the nature of substantial fiction texts and a suggested ‘reading as a writer’ focus. Students will record their responses to their reading of written texts - from a writer’s perspective - in their writer’s notebook. Focuses of their writing about their reading include: the source and structural development of ideas within the form; and the writing techniques used (including voice, symbolism and imagery). This record will form part of the evidence used to assess Criterion 5 (6th standard element) and Criterion 6 (1st and 4th standard elements).
It is not expected that substantial class time will be allocated to this reading.
WORK REQUIREMENTS: MODULE A
For assessment purposes students will complete:
*See current Writing Folio Guidelines for more information on ‘manuscript standard’.
WORK REQUIREMENTS: MODULE B
For assessment purposes students will complete:
WORK REQUIREMENTS: MODULE C (APPROXIMATELY EQUAL WORK FROM EACH PART)
For assessment purposes students will complete:
WORK REQUIREMENTS: MODULE D, PART 1
For assessment purposes students will create:
WORK REQUIREMENTS: MODULE D, PART 2
For assessment purposes students will create at least:
SUMMARY OF COURSE WORK REQUIREMENTS
‘Reading as a writer’ of three substantial texts and records in writer’s notebook
AND
THE CRAFT OF WRITING
WRITERS AND THEIR WRITING
IDEAS, ISSUES AND TEXTS
WRITING AND TECHNOLOGY
THE WRITING PROJECT
Criterion-based assessment is a form of outcomes assessment that identifies the extent of learner achievement at an appropriate end-point of study. Although assessment – as part of the learning program – is continuous, much of it is formative, and is done to help learners identify what they need to do to attain the maximum benefit from their study of the course. Therefore, assessment for summative reporting to TASC will focus on what both teacher and learner understand to reflect end-point achievement.
The standard of achievement each learner attains on each criterion is recorded as a rating ‘A’, ‘B’, or ‘C’, according to the outcomes specified in the standards section of the course.
A ‘t’ notation must be used where a learner demonstrates any achievement against a criterion less than the standard specified for the ‘C’ rating.
A ‘z’ notation is to be used where a learner provides no evidence of achievement at all.
Providers offering this course must participate in quality assurance processes specified by TASC to ensure provider validity and comparability of standards across all awards. To learn more, see TASC's quality assurance processes and assessment information.
Internal assessment of all criteria will be made by the provider. Providers will report the learner’s rating for each criterion to TASC.
TASC will supervise the external assessment of designated criteria which will be indicated by an asterisk (*). The ratings obtained from the external assessments will be used in addition to internal ratings from the provider to determine the final award.
The following processes will be facilitated by TASC to ensure there is:
Process – TASC gives course providers feedback about any systematic differences in the relationship of their internal and external assessments and, where appropriate, seeks further evidence through audit and requires corrective action in the future.
The external assessment requirements for the course English Writing Level 3 consists of a folio. The folio will comprise four pieces:
Folio will comprise a total of between 5000 and 8000 words, and be of manuscript standard.
The criteria to be assessed are: 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5.
Further information on the folio is available in the Folio Guidelines for this course which can be found in the Supporting Documents below.
The assessment of English Writing Level 3 will be based on the degree to which the learner can:
* = denotes criteria that are both internally and externally assessed
This criterion is both internally and externally assessed.
The learner:
Rating A | Rating B | Rating C |
---|---|---|
creates sustained texts that synthesise ideas and information from varied sources that are pertinent to purpose, context and audience | creates texts that adapt ideas and information from varied sources that are relevant to purpose, context and audience | creates texts which are appropriate to purpose, context and audience |
accurately uses grammatical conventions, punctuation and spelling | accurately uses grammatical conventions, punctuation and spelling | uses grammatical conventions, punctuation and spelling to achieve clarity |
uses appropriate register and sophisticated vocabulary and syntax | uses appropriate register, vocabulary and syntax | uses appropriate vocabulary and syntax |
communicates ideas using nuanced language with precision, subtlety and originality | communicates ideas using clear, controlled and precise language | communicates ideas using clear and controlled language |
creates texts that address all required task characteristics* with a high degree of accuracy | creates texts that address all required task characteristics* | creates texts that address most aspects of required task characteristics* |
clearly identifies information, images, ideas and words of others used in the student’s work | clearly identifies information, images, ideas and words of others used in the student’s work | differentiates information, images, ideas and words of others from the student’s own |
clearly identifies sources of the information, images, ideas and words that are not the student’s own. Referencing conventions and methodologies are followed with a high degree of accuracy. | clearly identifies sources of the information, images, ideas and words that are not the student’s own. Referencing conventions and methodologies are followed correctly. | identifies the sources of information, images, ideas and words that are not the student’s own. Referencing conventions and methodologies are generally followed correctly. |
creates appropriate, well structured reference lists/ bibliographies. | creates appropriate, structured reference lists/ bibliographies. | creates appropriate reference lists/bibliographies. |
About this Criterion: Texts may be classified as imaginative, interpretive, analytical or persuasive types of texts. These distinctions are neither static nor discrete and particular texts can belong to more than one category. Learners will create texts in a range of text types over the duration of the course (i.e. the sum total body of texts submitted for assessment will be from a range of text types). Individual texts submitted for assessment may be of a single type, and will be assessed against the standards above by markers.
* ‘required characteristics’ may include: degree of polish (e.g. to manuscript standard or draft only); word limits; formatting requirements; and presentation requirements. Note: texts submitted for external assessment are required to be of manuscript standard, and meet the format specifications and word limits given in the current TASC-published Folio Guidelines.
This criterion is both internally and externally assessed.
Rating 'A':
The learner creates skilful, sustained and complex written texts that include purposeful experimentation of language features in different text types, genres and styles. The learner:
Rating 'B':
The learner creates coherent and complex written texts that use language features effectively in different text types and genres. The learner:
Rating 'C':
The learner creates coherent written texts that demonstrate control of language features in different text types and genres. The learner:
Rating A | Rating B | Rating C |
---|---|---|
makes language choices that are appropriate for purpose, genre and text type, and experiments with language usage to effectively shape mood and tone in order to achieve purpose | makes language choices that are appropriate for purpose, genre and text type, and shape mood and tone in order to achieve purpose | makes language choices that are appropriate for purpose, genre and text type |
demonstrates controlled language usage by making language choices that effectively clarify meaning and/or create impact | demonstrates controlled language usage by making language choices that clarify meaning and/or create impact | demonstrates some control of language usage in making language choices to clarify meaning and/or create impact |
effectively uses a wide range of figurative language devices to evoke emotional/intellectual responses and create shades of meaning | uses a wide range of figurative language devices to solicit emotional/intellectual responses and create shades of meaning | uses a range of figurative language devices to create impact on rhythm, mood and meaning |
adopts, sustains or manipulates point/s of view and voice/s* to achieve desired effects | adopts and sustains a point of view and voice* that is consistent with purpose, genre and text type | adopts a point of view and voice* that is consistent with purpose, genre and text type |
consistently uses diction that is appropriate for purpose, audience, genre and text type. Choices in vocabulary and styles of expression serve to enhance clarity of meaning and create desired effect. | consistently uses diction that is appropriate for purpose, audience, genre and text type. Choices in vocabulary and styles of expression serve to clarify meaning and create effect. | uses diction that is generally appropriate for purpose, audience, genre and text type |
correctly uses complex grammar, maintaining and varying tenses for meaning. | correctly uses grammar, maintaining and varying tenses for meaning. | correctly uses basic grammar and appropriately maintains tense. |
* ‘Voice’ is used here to refer to the nature of the voice projected in a text by an author (for example, ‘authorial voice’ in a literary text or ‘expert voice’ in an exposition).
This criterion is both internally and externally assessed.
Rating 'A':
The learner creates skilful, sustained and complex written texts that include purposeful experimentation of conventions in different genres and styles. The learner:
Rating 'B':
The learner creates coherent and complex written texts. The learner:
Rating 'C':
The learner creates coherent written texts. The learner:
Rating A | Rating B | Rating C |
---|---|---|
uses clear and varied sentence/poetic structure to achieve intended effect | uses clear and varied sentence/poetic structure | uses clear, simple sentence/poetic structures |
selects and uses literary and structural presentation conventions appropriate to chosen genre. The student purposefully experiments with some conventions to effectively achieve purpose. | selects and uses literary and structural presentation conventions appropriate to chosen genre in order to create a unified text | selects and uses literary and structural presentation conventions generally appropriate to chosen genre |
considers, selects and uses structural elements that enhance clarity of meaning and create effect | selects and uses structural elements appropriate to genre | selects and uses basic structural elements generally appropriate to genre |
uses punctuation, sentence structures and paragraphing that are consistent with genre and demonstrate effective control of pacing | uses punctuation, sentence structures and paragraphing that are consistent with genre and demonstrate control of pacing | uses punctuation, sentence structures and paragraphing that are generally consistent with genre and demonstrate some control of pacing |
selects, uses and manipulates literary conventions and structural devices to create desired effects, engage audience and evoke response. | selects and uses literary conventions and structural devices to create effect and engage audience. | selects and uses literary conventions and structural devices to engage audience. Their effectiveness may be limited. |
This criterion is both internally and externally assessed.
Rating 'A':
The learner writes skilful, complex and sustained imaginative texts that include purposeful experimentation of conventions in different genres and styles. The learner:
Rating 'B':
The learner writes coherent, complex sustained imaginative texts. The learner:
Rating 'C':
The learner writes coherent, sustained imaginative texts. The learner:
Rating A | Rating B | Rating C |
---|---|---|
adopts and sustains or manipulates perspective to achieve desired effects | adopts and sustains a perspective consistent with purpose and genre | adopt a perspective that is generally consistent with purpose and genre |
composes texts that develop complex ideas/themes | composes texts that develop complex ideas/themes | composes texts that explore ideas/themes |
creates believable characters, contexts and plots. Characters and/or plots credibly develop in complexity. | creates and sustains believable characters, contexts and plots | creates generally believable characters, contexts and plots. These may have some weak elements or be contrived. |
maintains continuity in the use of language features, style and technique and/or purposefully experiments with continuity to create effect | maintains continuity in the use of language features, style and technique | generally maintains continuity in the use of language features, style and technique |
engages the imagination of intended audience and evokes desired emotional/intellectual response. | engages the imagination of intended audience and solicits some emotional/ intellectual response. | engages the interest of intended audience. |
Notes:
As noted earlier, imaginative texts are a strong focus of this course. These are texts whose primary purpose is to entertain or provoke thought through their imaginative use of literary elements. This text type may include, but is not limited to, fiction texts as well as non-fiction texts such as expository and descriptive texts.
In some cases (such as non-narrative poetry) the third standard element may not be applicable to particular texts submitted for assessment, internally or externally.
This criterion is both internally and externally assessed.
The learner reflects on sources of inspiration, evaluates own texts, and edits in response to considered feedback. The learner:
Rating A | Rating B | Rating C |
---|---|---|
describes sources of ideas, themes, characters and plots used in own texts, and critically analyses their scope and relevance to intended audience | describes sources of ideas, themes, characters and plots used in own texts, and analyses their scope and relevance to intended audience | identifies and describes sources of ideas, themes, characters and plots used in own texts |
identifies the purpose of own texts, intended audiences’ context, and analyses the relationship between purpose and audience | describes the purpose of own texts and intended audiences’ context | identifies the purpose of own texts and some aspects of intended audiences’ context |
analyses features of own use of language and stylistic features, literary conventions, genre and structure, and evaluates choices with reference to purpose and audience | analyses features of own use of language and stylistic features, literary conventions, genre and structure, and justifies choices with reference to purpose and audience | identifies features of own use of language and stylistic features, literary conventions, genre and structure, and relates choices to purpose and audience |
evaluates how relationships between content, structure, voice and perspective shape meaning, and evaluates presentation | analyses the relationships between content, structure, voice and point of view, and evaluates presentation | considers effectiveness of content and presentation |
reflects on feedback from others, evaluates its relevance, and edits texts to effectively address relevant issues | reflects on feedback from others, analyses its relevance, and edits texts to address relevant issues | edits texts in response to feedback from others |
analyses how and why writing styles and techniques of others have been used/borrowed, rejected or modified in own texts | analyses how and why writing styles and techniques of others have been used/borrowed in own texts | identifies and describes how writing styles and techniques of others have been used/borrowed in own texts |
correctly uses a wide range of specialist terms* and nuanced language in analysis of own texts and writing style(s). | correctly uses a wide range of specialist terms* in analysis of own texts and writing style(s). | correctly uses a limited range of specialist terms* in discussion of own texts and writing style(s). |
*‘specialist terms’ refers to metalanguage and terms such as those used to describe literary techniques, devices, schemes and trope.
The learner:
Rating A | Rating B | Rating C |
---|---|---|
evaluates the effectiveness of writing styles and techniques used in a wide range of texts | analyses the writing styles and techniques used in a wide range of texts | describes the writing styles and techniques used in a range of texts |
evaluates effectiveness of literary conventions, structure and style in enhancing aesthetic appeal | analyses effects of literary language, structure and style in texts | describes the effect of literary language, structure and style in texts |
correctly uses a wide range of specialist terms* and nuanced language in the analysis of texts | correctly uses a wide range of specialist terms* in the analysis of texts | correctly uses a limited range of specialist terms* in the analysis of texts |
evaluates effectiveness of different perspectives, values and voice represented in texts | analyses different perspectives, values and voice represented in texts | describes different perspectives, values and voices represented in texts |
– in collaborative workshop situations – gives constructive, insightful relevant feedback and suggestions in an appropriate manner | – in collaborative workshop situations – gives constructive, detailed and relevant feedback in an appropriate manner | – in collaborative workshop situations – gives some relevant feedback in an appropriate manner |
evaluates the impact of technology and the internet on the ways in which text is written, distributed and read, and its changing purposes. | analyses the impact of technology and the internet on the ways in which text is written, distributed and read, and its changing purposes. | describes the impact of technology and the internet on the ways in which text is written, distributed and read, and its changing purposes. |
* ‘specialist terms’ refers to metalanguage and terms such as those used to describe literary techniques, devices, schemes and trope.
The learner uses negotiation, task and time management strategies, and drafting/editing processes. The learner:
Rating A | Rating B | Rating C |
---|---|---|
proposes/negotiates complex goals which are measurable, achievable and realistic | proposes/negotiates complex goals which are measurable, achievable and realistic | proposes/negotiates goals which are measurable, achievable and realistic |
evaluates, selects and uses planning tools and strategies to achieve objectives and manage activities within proposed times | selects and uses planning tools and strategies to achieve objectives and manage activities within proposed times | uses planning tools to achieve objectives within proposed times |
reflects on progress towards meeting goals and timelines, critically evaluates progress and plans future actions | reflects on progress towards meeting goals and timelines, analyses progress and plans future actions | reflects on progress towards meeting goals and timelines, and articulates some ways in which goals can be met in the future |
effectively uses a range of planning, drafting, editing and proofing strategies to critically evaluate and refine the effectiveness of own texts | effectively uses planning, drafting, editing and proofing strategies to develop the effectiveness of own texts | uses planning, drafting, editing and proofing strategies as directed to develop the effectiveness of own texts |
meets specified/negotiated timelines and addresses all required task characteristics* with a high degree of accuracy. | meets specified/ negotiated timelines and addresses all required task characteristics.* | meets specified/negotiated timelines and addresses most aspects of required task characteristics.* |
* ‘required task characteristics’ may include: degree of polish (e.g. to manuscript standard or draft only); word limits; formatting requirements; and presentation requirements.
English Writing Level 3 (with the award of):
EXCEPTIONAL ACHIEVEMENT
HIGH ACHIEVEMENT
COMMENDABLE ACHIEVEMENT
SATISFACTORY ACHIEVEMENT
PRELIMINARY ACHIEVEMENT
The final award will be determined by the Office of Tasmanian Assessment, Standards and Certification from the 12 ratings (7 from the internal assessment, 5 from the external assessment).
The minimum requirements for an award in English Writing Level 3 are as follows:
EXCEPTIONAL ACHIEVEMENT (EA)
10 ‘A’ ratings, 2 ‘B’ ratings (4 ‘A’ ratings, 1 ‘B’ rating from external assessment)
HIGH ACHIEVEMENT (HA)
4 ‘A’ ratings, 5 ‘B’ ratings, 3 ‘C’ ratings (2 ‘A’ ratings, 2 ‘B’ ratings and 1 ‘C’ rating from external assessment)
COMMENDABLE ACHIEVEMENT (CA)
6 ‘B’ ratings, 5 ‘C’ ratings (2 ‘B’ ratings, 2 ‘C’ ratings from external assessment)
SATISFACTORY ACHIEVEMENT (SA)
10 ‘C’ ratings (3 ‘C’ ratings from external assessment)
PRELIMINARY ACHIEVEMENT (PA)
6 ‘C’ ratings
A learner who otherwise achieves the ratings for a CA (Commendable Achievement) or SA (Satisfactory Achievement) award but who fails to show any evidence of achievement in one or more criteria (‘z’ notation) will be issued with a PA (Preliminary Achievement) award.
The Department of Education’s Curriculum Services will develop and regularly revise the curriculum. This evaluation will be informed by the experience of the course’s implementation, delivery and assessment.
In addition, stakeholders may request Curriculum Services to review a particular aspect of an accredited course.
Requests for amendments to an accredited course will be forwarded by Curriculum Services to the Office of TASC for formal consideration.
Such requests for amendment will be considered in terms of the likely improvements to the outcomes for learners, possible consequences for delivery and assessment of the course, and alignment with Australian Curriculum materials.
A course is formally analysed prior to the expiry of its accreditation as part of the process to develop specifications to guide the development of any replacement course.
The accreditation period for this course has been renewed from 1 January 2022 until 31 December 2024.
During the accreditation period required amendments can be considered via established processes.
Should outcomes of the Years 9-12 Review process find this course unsuitable for inclusion in the Tasmanian senior secondary curriculum, its accreditation may be cancelled. Any such cancellation would not occur during an academic year.
Version 1 – Accredited on 20 June 2013 for use in 2014 to 2018. This course replaces the course English Writing (ENW315109) that expired on 31 December 2013.
Version 1.a – 13 May 2014 Clarifications made as per TASC decision (2 April 2014, Item 2.5), including notations on criteria 1 and 4, and change to the criterion heading of the latter.
Version 1.b - 22 November 2018 Addition to Learning Outcomes. Accreditation renewed on 22 November 2018 for the period 1 January 2019 until 31 December 2021.
Version 1.c - Renewal of Accreditation on 14 July 2021 for the period 31 December 2021 until 31 December 2023, without amendments.
Illustrative examples of the nature of substantial fiction texts and a suggested ‘reading as a writer’ focus:
Focus | Illustrative Examples (Only) |
Descriptive Writing | Tim Winton Breath |
Barbara Kingsolver The Poisonwood Bible | |
Cormac McCarthy The Road | |
Kathryn Lomer The God in the Ink | |
Words and perspectives | David Levithan The Lover’s Dictionary |
Anne Michaels Fugitive Pieces | |
Tim Winton The Turning | |
Kate Grenville The Lieutenant | |
Creating Character | David Gutterson, Snow falling on Cedars |
Muriel Barbery The Elegance of the Hedgehog | |
Selected short stories works by Archie Roach | |
Antoine de Saint-Exupery The Little Prince | |
Patrick Ness A Monster Calls | |
Charles Dickens Great Expectations | |
Harper Lee To Kill a Mockingbird | |
Danielle Wood Rosie Little’s Cautionary Tales for Girls | |
Alexander McCall Smith The No 1 Ladies Detective Agency | |
Dialogue | Alan Bennett The Uncommon Reader |
Emily Donoghue, Room | |
Tim Winton The Turning | |
Tom Petsinis The Twelfth Dialogue | |
Richard Flanagan Wanting | |
Point of View | Marai Sandor Embers |
Hilary Mantel Wolf Hall | |
J. D. Salinger Catcher in the Rye | |
Margaret Atwood The Handmaid’s Tale | |
Lionel Shriver We Need to Talk About Kevin | |
Jonathan Safran Foer Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close | |
Nam Le The Boat | |
Writing Structures | Mark Haddon The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-time |
Michael Ondaatje The English Patient | |
Markus Zusak The Book Thief | |
David Malouf Fly Away Peter | |
Robert Cormier After the First Death | |
Writers and research | Bernard Schlink The Reader |
Tracey Chevalier Remarkable Creatures | |
Thomas Keneally Schindler’s Ark | |
Kate Grenville Searching for the Secret River |